Centrally Controlled vs Distributed Systems

Fill in the blanks

Centrally controlled systems are designed to manage and operate from a point of control, typically through a central or control unit. This architecture streamlines decision-making and data , making it a common choice for various applications, particularly in environments where centralized management is essential. In contrast, distributed systems refer to a collection of independent or nodes that collaborate to achieve a common goal while appearing to users as a single coherent system. These systems can operate over local area , wide area networks, or even the internet, allowing multiple devices to communicate and share seamlessly.



The structure of centrally controlled systems relies on all decision-making, control, and processing happening at a central node or server, with all other devices being dependent on this central hub for and data processing. On the other hand, distributed systems spread processing and decision-making across multiple , where each node operates semi-independently, collaborating with others to perform tasks. In terms of performance, centrally controlled systems can experience if the central server becomes overloaded, while distributed systems tend to scale better, as tasks are spread across multiple nodes, thus handling more concurrent processes.



When considering security, centralized systems concentrate protective measures at a central hub, meaning if the central server is , the entire system can be compromised. Distributed systems, however, face more complex security due to multiple nodes, but a compromise of one node doesn’t necessarily affect the entire . Scalability also poses challenges for centrally controlled systems since it is limited by the capacity of the central server, making often expensive and time-consuming. Conversely, distributed systems are highly , with new nodes easily added to expand capacity with minimal disruption.



Lastly, centralized systems are highly vulnerable to failure at the point; if this central node goes down, the entire system may fail. In contrast, distributed systems offer more resilience to failure, as if one node fails, others can continue to operate, providing and reducing downtime. Examples of centrally controlled systems include traditional banking systems and legacy enterprise systems, while distributed systems are exemplified by cloud computing platforms and blockchain technology, making them suitable for large organizations in need of fast and scalable solutions.

Keywords

degradation | resources | networks | processing | scalable | system | expansion | single | nodes | central | instructions | computers | server | redundancy | breached |