Client server vs Peer to Peer

Fill in the blanks

In today's technological landscape, various networking architectures have emerged to support different communication needs. Two prominent architectures are the - and peer-to-peer (P2P) networks. In a client-server model, the system is bifurcated into distinct entities: the server, and the client. The server acts as a central hub, storing resources and providing services to multiple clients. This approach simplifies management, enhances , and ensures reliable access to shared resources.

In contrast, the peer-to-peer network distributes the responsibilities evenly among all connected devices, eliminating the need for a central server. Each node in a functions as both a client and a server, enabling direct communication and between peers. This approach excels in terms of scalability, as adding more nodes increases the network's capacity without introducing bottlenecks. Furthermore, P2P networks exhibit as the loss of a single node does not disrupt the whole network.

Both client-server and P2P architectures offer distinctive advantages concerning specific requirements. For instance, client-server networks are well-suited for applications that demand high , as the server acts as a gatekeeper and can implement stringent access control measures. Additionally, servers can optimize resource utilization, ensuring efficient allocation and utilization of shared resources.

On the other hand, P2P networks excel in scenarios involving large-scale and s. By leveraging the computing power and storage capabilities of each connected device, P2P networks enable efficient resource sharing, contributing to improved overall . Furthermore, resource redundancy within a P2P network enhances , as multiple copies of data can be distributed across multiple peers.

Keywords

server | scalability | centralized | resource sharing | file sharing | security | fault tolerance | p2p network | efficiency | reliability | decentralized | distributed network | client |