RAID 0 is best suited for applications that require and can tolerate the loss of data.

RAID 5 can tolerate the failure of drive without losing data.

RAID 1 requires at least drives for mirroring.

RAID 5 uses to provide fault tolerance by spreading data across multiple disks.

RAID 10 is a good compromise between performance and .

Parity is used in RAID 5 to provide fault tolerance by allowing data to be reconstructed from remaining blocks.

In RAID 0, if one drive fails, all data is .

RAID 1 requires at least disks to mirror data.

RAID 5 uses parity data to provide .

One of the disadvantages of RAID is the cost of additional .

RAID 10 combines and mirroring for both performance and redundancy.

RAID 5 can tolerate the loss of disk without data loss.

RAID 10 offers both performance and redundancy by striping data and it.